HealthETeams Support

Support
  • Chesapeake Bay Area
  • Virginia Beach, VA
  • 23455
  • (757) 636-1775
PUBLIC PROFILE

Opining on an Opinion Piece on Reforming Health Care in Virginia

Posted by Chip Block on February 27, 2018 9:25 AM EST
Chip Block photo

Sometimes, as Joe has consistently written, the best way to state a strong and supportive point of view, is to re-post a great......

....bit of content written by another person.  And when that other person happens to be a well-regarded 16-ear member of the Virginia House of Delegates, then maybe the content has even more impact.  And when it is tied to language supporting the expansion of health reform and a balanced state budget, then it becomes a downright "must read".

However, I am simply going to repost the most compelling and most relevant aspect of the opinion piece as it relates to driving change, better quality and access and cost controls and healthy living in the state of Virginia.  It was written by Chris Jones and published in this past Sunday's Opinion section (3.25.2018) in Joe's favorite newspaper, The Virginian-Pilot.  Unlike many editorials, this one has a decidedly conservative bent is absolutely compelling for it makes a powerfully logical and conservative case for the expansion of Medicaid in a state that has been hard-pressed to deny that idea on mostly political reasons embedded in financial concerns.

I will not publish the entire editorial/Op-Ed Opinion piece that Delegate Jones authored.  But the core part of the piece is excellently written and is a compelling move to tie legislation, federal funding, political compromise and health reform wrapped into the title, health care reform.  Speaking of the title, it was entitled "Virginia's way forward on reforming health care" and was featured "Op ED' in Our Views.

So, here is an excerpt from a nicely written opinion, which suggests HOPE for a solution that makes sense:

"The budget is balanced, cautious with revenue estimates and consistent with our policy goals.  It targets investments in the core functions of state government, such as K-12 and higher education.  Most notably, the House is taking a significant step to expand reform health care for low-income Virginians.

The House plan would set up a path for Virginia to use federal Medicaid funding to provide private health insurance to low-income Virginians and include long-sought conservative reforms.  Virginia will simultaneously pursue additional health care funding and a waiver to reform parts of the Affordable Care Act.

Virginia will use the expanded federal funding to enroll participants in a private insurance plan.  Options include a managed-care plan negotiated between an insurer and the state, an individual plan available on the health insurance exchange or employer-sponsored plans.  Health savings accounts to encourage personal responsibility-similar to the plan adopted by Vice-president Mike Pence when he was governor of Indiana-also would be included.

Our key reforms include a requirement that able-bodied individuals on Medicaid enroll in the Training, Education, and Employment Opportunity Program.  TEEOP is modeled after the waiver approved for Kentucky and represents our vision for educational opportunities and the dignity of work.

For Virginians with incomes between 100 and 138 percent of the federal poverty level, our plan provides access to private health insurance or employer-sponsored health plans through premium assistance.  It also includes reasonable and sensible premiums and cost-sharing so that newly eligible individuals are accountable for improving their well-being.  Primary care services and wellness checkups are prioritized over emergency room visits, encouraging people to adopt healthy behaviors and bringing down health care costs for everybody.

Our plan requires hospitals to pay for the state's share of the cost of expansion.  This responsible step means individual taxpayers will not have to pay more, or risk seeing funds cut from education, in order to increase health care coverage.

My colleagues and I in the House have expressed concerns about the potential effect of expansion and whether the federal government will keep this commitment. We do not pretend that these concerns are going away, and we took proactive steps to address them".

There are no comments

Sign in to add your comment.

Recent Posts

The Third Way: Innovation Decisions
The Third Way to innovation success depends on four key decisions.....
read more
Disruptive Innovation: Easier for Non-consumers to Access
One of the most effective drivers of adoption for any new product or service is ease. Whether it...
read more
The "Third Way" Could Be The Right Way
A few weeks ago I wrote about the "practical applications" potential for innovations that seemd to...
read more
Disruptive Innovations: Simple, Not Complex
As with the other key characteristics of disruptive innovations, a common factor that is found in...
read more
Disruptive Innovation: Low Cost or FREE
One of the key classic elements of disruptive innovation is that the innovation is often very low...
read more
Disruptive Innovation: Rarely Supported by Good Managers
The second element of disruptive innovations is that they are almost never supported by.....
read more
Disruptive Innovations: Attract New Consumers
One of the key attributes of successful disruptive innovations is that they drive consumption from...
read more
The Third Way: Innovation Application
A recently published book from the prestigious Havard Business Publishing house describes a "Third...
read more
Feedback: Disruptive Innovation
I like what Joe's blogs are doing, and have this brief statement....
read more
Key Elements of Disruptive Innovation
These days we hear a lot about innovation. It's almost a buzz word of sorts. But we hear much less...
read more

Go to blog